Thursday, June 13, 2024
HomeMedicinePublic HealthDo ventilator allocation guidelines misrepresent minority communities?

Do ventilator allocation guidelines misrepresent minority communities?

A recent review examined the contribution of members from disadvantaged communities in creating the guiding principles for ventilator allocation.

Ethical guidelines regarding the allocation of scarce resources in medicine have long been debated by experts and community members.

The problem of rationing ventilators has become particularly salient during the current COVID-19 pandemic. With a limited number of ventilators available to hospitals, unfortunate and unavoidable dilemmas arise regarding who gets it first.

The current guidelines for ventilator triage use controversial utilitarian principles, focusing on saving the most lives, and/or the most life-years. In other words, the guidelines suggest prioritizing those that would most likely survive by receiving the ventilators, as well as those who are youngest.

The authors of such guidelines often report surveying both the experts as well as the communities to create these principles. However, as disadvantaged communities in the United States have been affected more severely by the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to examine how minority communities view the issue of ventilator allocation.

As published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, researchers conducted a review of literature to examine this issue. The review included six studies with a sample totaling over 10,000 participants.

Furthermore, in one study the researchers found that younger participants were much less likely favor saving the most lives, as compared with older participants. Another study showed that those younger than 60 years of age were significantly more likely to object to the life cycle criterion (i.e. prioritizing patients with the most life-years left). Still another study found that 58% of participants under 30 years of age preferred saving the most lives, while 57% of participants over 50 years of age preferred help the worst off.

Important to note is the fact that the researchers found only a very small number of studies that included community preference measures. Of these six studies, only one-half reported measures by race, income and age. This significant limitation hinders the understanding of the involvement of disadvantaged communities in the preferences guiding resource allocation.

According to the authors, of the available data, the overall trend shows that participants from disadvantaged communities preferring criteria that would increase their chance of receiving the ventilator. This finding is in contrast with the criteria of saving the most lives, and the most life-years, which favors those with the best baseline health.

The researchers call for more intensive studies examining the issue of ventilator allocation in minority communities, particularly as it relates to issues influenced by systemic inequality.

Written by Maor Bernshtein

Reference: Kerr, W., &  Schmidt, H. (2020). COVID-19 ventilator rationing protocols: why we need to know more about the views of those with most to lose. Journal of Medical Ethics. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106948.

Image by Thiago Lazarino from Pixabay 

Maor Bernshtein
Maor Bernshtein
Maor is currently working on his BSc in psychology from York University in Toronto, Canada. He is interested in psychological research and likes to analyze results and apply them to everyday life. Maor has previously volunteered for The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and is passionate about bringing psychological knowledge back to the people. He hopes that others can benefit from psychological insights through his work and improve their overall life and well-being.
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News and Articles

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS

Stay Connected
10,288FansLike
820FollowersFollow
249FollowersFollow
2,787FollowersFollow

Article of the month

Vitamin D as an Anti Colorectal Cancer Agent in 2024 – a Review of the Evidence

Vitamin D has a protective effect against colorectal cancer, but it is patient and population dependent.According to the WHO, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the...

Joke Of The Day- June 14

Friend 1: Are you sick? When are you going to see a doctor? Friend 2: Not now, I will go later. Friend 1: Later you will be seeing a...

ADVERTISE WITH US

error: Content is read-only and copy-protected.