Sunday, June 16, 2024
HomeMedicineDentistryIs Water Fluoridation Worth the Price?

Is Water Fluoridation Worth the Price?

A recent study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions such as water fluoridation to prevent dental caries in New Zealand.

Treating oral disease costs millions of dollars, ranking it the fourth among expensive diseases to treat globally. In New Zealand, adults are keeping their natural teeth for longer than ever and because of this, the risk for dental caries, or cavities, is high. By international standards, the rate of dental caries in New Zealand is high with subgroups such as the Pacific peoples, Maori, and those living in deprived areas having missing teeth and untreated caries which significantly lower the quality of life.

Dental caries has decreased in developed countries over the last four decades by introducing fluoride in water, salt, and toothpaste.  Fluoride occurs naturally in most water sources although the natural levels for New Zealand are low by international standards. Through the process of Community Water Fluoridation (CWF), many countries which have attempted to correct suboptimal naturally occurring levels of fluoride. This article, published in the BMC Oral Health Journal examines the cost benefit and cost effectiveness of adding fluoride to water sources in New Zealand considering the expenditure involved as well as life years wherein quality is improved.

How Much Water is Fluoridated?

The process of water fluoridation in New Zealand began in 1954. Reticulated water is provided to 85% New Zealanders across the country and 56% of those receive fluoridated water. Thirty-nine of the 66 territories in New Zealand are not adjusting the fluoride levels in the water received. There have been concerns and counter-claims raised to the practise of fluoridation; there is some evidence that fluoridation increases the risk of osteosarcoma and may also hamper children’s cognitive development. However, there have been no valid proven negative effects connected to fluoridation levels in New Zealand. Jurisdictional courts have ruled favourably following a detailed investigation into such detrimental effects and dismissed these concerns as invalid.

Water Fluoridation Leads to Health Care Savings

While studies in the past have examined the community water fluoridation program costs and the likely benefits resulting in long-term cost-effectiveness, this study is a recent re-evaluation. Updated studies are important to implement the most sound and relevant health care practices and policies. The period of study considered was 20 years which is the period of capital investment in water plants. In terms of the benefits for quality of life,  which were measured for the study, the researchers found that an average of 27 quality-of-life years was seen for every million dollars invested. Translated into numbers, the net savings in adding fluoride to reticulated water in populations over 500 during a span of 20 years is estimated at NZ $1,401 million.

The authors conclude that community water fluoridation is a cost-effective health intervention for all but very small communities. While the healthcare savings tend to be very small per person, when evaluated over the entire population, the savings are substantial.

While the impact of water fluoridation is expected to be uniformly beneficial across ethnic groups and socio-economic classes, there are some differences. With a greater occurrence of dental caries in Maori, Pasifika, and other deprived communities, there is definitely a greater absolute benefit in these sections. There are strong economic grounds for water fluoridation in New Zealand as a cost-effective practice. This indicates solid reasons for increasing government subsidies to support such initiatives, to extend this practice beyond solely the dominantly urban centres where it is currently practiced. The health benefits from community water fluoridation translate into a significant and noteworthy benefit, reducing the national disease burden for socioeconomic and ethnic groups across the country.

Written by Sonia Leslie Fernandez, Medical News Writer

References: Moore, D., Poynton, M., Broadbent, J. M., & Thomson, W. M. (2017). The costs and benefits of water fluoridation in NZ. BMC Oral Health17, 134.

  1. Fluoridation is unethical, immoral (forced on EVERYONE without consent) and current science now proves it is ineffective for teeth and dangerous to health.

    In addition it is the most uneconomical method to distribute any drug/chemical. People drink less than 1% of the water delivered to them So 99% is flushed down the drain in washers, toilets, washing the dog, etc.
    Over 99% of the money communities spend on fluoride is flushed directly down the drain.
    It is an absolute waste of tax money.

  2. The real cause of dental decay is sugar and this is increasing alarmingly in countries such as Australia that have been systematically poisoning the reticulated water of unsuspecting consumers by adding a known neurotoxin to the water and pretending it is a “health benefit”. The real issue here is not dental caries but big corporations having problems with disposing of the chemical waste generated by the production of phosphate fertilisers and aluminium.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News and Articles


Stay Connected

Article of the month

Vitamin D as an Anti Colorectal Cancer Agent in 2024 – a Review of the Evidence

Vitamin D has a protective effect against colorectal cancer, but it is patient and population dependent.According to the WHO, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the...

Joke Of The Day

Dr. Johnson asks his patient, "Which do you want first, the good news or the bad news?" The patient replies, "Give me the good news." Dr. Johnson...


error: Content is read-only and copy-protected.