Friday, June 14, 2024
HomeWellnessDrugs and MedicationsWhat are the differences between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin?

What are the differences between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin?

A study published in the BMJ explored the safety and efficacy differences between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin across the general population.

Most studies observing the differences between oral anticoagulants and warfarin include patients with atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is a type of irregular heartbeat that can lead to blood clots, heart attacks, and strokes. One of the treatments for atrial fibrillation is oral anticoagulants or warfarin to prevent blood clots. Another indication for the use of oral anticoagulants and warfarin is for the prevention of blood clots in patients who need hip or knee replacements or other operations.

Warfarin is a blood thinner that has been used for the past 60 years. Warfarin interacts with many medications and foods. Patients are required to check their blood clotting factors on a regular basis and they often need dose adjustments of warfarin. The new oral anticoagulants offer patients the freedom from regular blood testing and a fixed dose. These new drugs include apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran.

Many studies have observed the efficacy and safety of the new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. The primary focus of a recent study published in the BMJ was to observe the differences between these two types of blood thinners in patients with and without atrial fibrillation.

Researchers at the University of Nottingham Division of Primary Care in England collected information on nearly 200,000 patients with and without a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. These patients were prescribed oral anticoagulants or warfarin. To study the safety of oral anticoagulants and warfarin, the researchers observed the number of major bleeding events in the study population. To assess the efficacy of these drugs, the researchers observed the number of strokes, blood clots, and deaths.

In patients with or without atrial fibrillation, apixaban caused less major bleeding events than warfarin and rivaroxaban. For bleeding in the brain, rivaroxaban showed an increased risk in the patients with atrial fibrillation when compared with apixaban. However, a decreased risk was observed in the patients without atrial fibrillation taking rivaroxaban compared with warfarin.

For stomach and intestinal bleeding, rivaroxaban showed higher risks compared with apixaban across both patient groups. Dabigatran was also showed a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding than apixaban in the patients without atrial fibrillation. Lastly, the risk of death was increased in all patients taking rivaroxaban compared with warfarin.

Across both patient groups, the risk of stroke was decreased with the use of oral anticoagulants and warfarin and no significant differences were observed. The risk of blood clots was also similar across all patient groups. However, an increased risk was observed in the patients without atrial fibrillation taking rivaroxaban.

Many limitations are present in this study. The researchers had no information on patient adherence to their medication. Patients often forget to take their medications. This puts patients at risk for blood clotting. In addition, patients on warfarin must undergo routine blood testing. Minor bleeds can be detected earlier and this prevents the occurrence of major bleeding events.

The major strength of this study compared to previous studies is the inclusion of patients without atrial fibrillation. This analysis offers a more generalized evidence for the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants and warfarin.

Further studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these blood thinners in different groups of patients without atrial fibrillation. Patients undergoing hip surgery should be studied separately from patients undergoing knee surgery or other operations.  Patients with a previous stroke or blood clot were excluded from this study but represent a large population of patients and require further investigation. Lastly, rivaroxaban and low doses of apixaban were associated with higher risks of death and this also requires more attention.

The results from this study show that apixaban is a safer drug than the other oral anticoagulants. In addition, the researchers have provided more generalized facts on the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants and warfarin for patients with and without atrial fibrillation.  Finally, the study also reassures clinicians on the safety and efficacy of the new oral anticoagulants as an alternative to warfarin.

Written by Jessica Caporuscio, PharmD

Reference: Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hill T, et al. Risks and benefits ofdirect oralanticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care. BMJ. 2018

Jessica Caporuscio PharmD
Jessica Caporuscio PharmD
Jessica received her Doctorate of Pharmacy from the University of Montreal in July 2014 and she has been working as a community pharmacist in the Greater Toronto Area since March 2015. She has a passion to communicate medical and drug information to her patients and other healthcare professionals. Jessica is also a marathoner and an Ironman triathlete. In her spare time, she is in her kitchen creating healthy recipes for her family.
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News and Articles

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS

Stay Connected
10,288FansLike
820FollowersFollow
249FollowersFollow
2,787FollowersFollow

Article of the month

Vitamin D as an Anti Colorectal Cancer Agent in 2024 – a Review of the Evidence

Vitamin D has a protective effect against colorectal cancer, but it is patient and population dependent.According to the WHO, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the...

Joke Of The Day- June 14

Friend 1: Are you sick? When are you going to see a doctor? Friend 2: Not now, I will go later. Friend 1: Later you will be seeing a...

ADVERTISE WITH US

error: Content is read-only and copy-protected.